Monday 18 February 2013

Whither Goest Thou, Joseph Ratzinger?

Quo Vadis? Joseph Ratzinger, Pope Benedict XVI, the first pontiff in six centuries to permit any power but Death itself to precipitate the processes of the Petrine Succession.
“UPON THIS ROCK I will build my church.” Not from these words, alone, does the Catholic Church trace its universal authority. But Jesus’s bestowal of the name “Peter” or Petros  (the Greek word for “rock”) upon Simon Bar-jonah, the first of his disciples to recognise him as the Christ, is by far the most familiar justification for what Catholic scholars call the “Petrine Succession”.
The full quotation from the Book of Matthew bears repeating. When Jesus asks his followers “Who do you say that I am?”, only Simon answers ‘correctly’. “You are the Christ,” says the fisherman, “Son of the living God.”  Blessing him, Jesus goes on to offer his famous benediction:
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven.”
As anyone who has ever visited the Vatican will tell you, the papal symbol of the crossed keys are everywhere. That’s because, according to Catholic tradition, the Bishopric of Rome (which, by virtue of Rome’s supremacy, confers leadership of the entire Church) has been passed, through God’s divine guidance, directly and in unbroken succession from Jesus’s right-hand-man to the present Bishop of Rome, Joseph Ratzinger – Pope Benedict XVI.
The very same pontiff who, on Tuesday morning, stunned the entire, one-billion-strong, Catholic Church by announcing his abdication.
Can a Pope really do that?
Well, it has been done before. Nearly 600 years ago Pope Gregory XII relinquished the papal throne – but only because the two other princes of the church who were at that time also claiming to be Pope had bigger armies at their backs. Since 1415, however, the pontificate has only been vacated when God called the incumbent home.
Given the proposition that it is God, himself, who guides the deliberations of the College of Cardinals (one of whose number will become the next Pope) this seems only right and proper. After all, when Simon identified him as the Christ, Jesus said: “Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jonah: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father who is in heaven.”
The Petrine Succession: [T]hou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. - Matthew 16:18
In other words the authority of the “rock”, upon whom Jesus would build his church, was not the product of Simon-Peter’s own will – born of flesh and blood – but of the will of God. Peter’s authority is God’s authority. If it were otherwise the Petrine Succession would make no sense.
So, is it really possible to step away from God’s will? Is the pontificate an office from which one can calmly announce one’s resignation? Is being the Pope just like being a Chief Executive? And the Papacy nothing more than a job?
Pope Benedict’s predecessor certainly didn’t think so. As Pope John-Paul II’s body was slowly and agonizingly broken on the cross of Parkinson’s Disease, the doughty Polish pontiff wore his pain as a blessing, saying it brought him closer in spirit to the suffering of Christ.
How many times must he have recalled the words of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane: “Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.”
Dame Lindsay Freer, speaking on behalf of the Auckland Catholic Diocese, told TV3’s Firstline: “I think that Pope Benedict has clearly become frailer, and it is a huge burden of office that he carries … I think he feels that out of respect for that office and the ministry that’s been entrusted to him, it’s time for somebody younger, stronger to take over.”
But that would make the Petrine Succession a purely human construct, and the Pope nothing more than a holy CEO.
According to Catholic legend, as Peter fled from certain crucifixion in Rome he encountered Jesus walking in the opposite direction. “Quo vadis?”, asked Peter. “Whither goest thou?”
“To Rome, to be crucified”, Jesus replied.
Peter turned around.
This essay was originally published in The Dominion Post, The Waikato Times, The Taranaki Daily News, The Timaru Herald, The Otago Daily Times and The Greymouth Star of Friday, 15 February 2013.


alwyn said...

I suppose that the Pope could simply reply, and probably would, something like.
I have come to this conclusion, after much prayer and in the knowledge that God desires that the head of his church must have the energy and health to lead the church.
Well something like that anyway. After all, who can possibly prove He didn't?

Anonymous said...

I can do better than that and who is to say... According to Catholic legend as Ratzinger was walking in the Vatican Gardens he encountered Jesus walking in the opposite direction. And Jesus told him I've come to tell you to give it away...and who can prove otherwise..although of course he might be the CEO of the great corporation that is Vatican Bank...

Another blog Chris .. I dare you!

Anonymous said...

Jesus said 'suffer little children' - and Ratzinger let them suffer.

Nick said...

Heaven forbid that the managerialist ethos of the Taylorist business schools (Harvard etc) has penetrated to the core of the Vatican. Will the next Pope require an MBA?

Anonymous said...

Really, who cares?
Don't encourage them (the Catholic church) by giving them attention.
Why pander to a pre-medieval mindset?

The media loves the pageantry and rituals of the Vatican, and quarter informed speculation on it. But the Vatican only has power over people who give it to them , at least in places like NZ. Even in places like Ireland, their power has greatly diminished.

The Catholic church like most (all?) organised religion, has never been a real force for good, though it has often been a force for order.
And disorganized religion is just superstition. (Organised religion is superstition plus control).

Respecting peoples' religion mean acknowledging their right to have it, not pretending you think there is anything to it.

Anonymous said...

So there's nothing whatsoever to Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism?

List the ideas of these ancient traditions of scholarship, devotion and selfless action which you think are worthless.

TigerMountain said...

sorry Ron Howard and Tom Hanks Dan Brown Film adaptations have spoilt all this vatican mumbo jumbo for me, could not give a ratzinger’s ass.

Bring back liberation theology and stop picking on women and indoctrinating children would be a start to getting some credibility for such a rotten organised religion.