Tuesday, 30 July 2013

The Contagion Of Evil

The Black Prison: The United States new detention facility on Bagram Airbase a few kilometres north of Kabul in Afghanistan. Recent revelations concerning the behaviour of the NZDF in that country - most particularly its use of US surveillance facilities to monitor the activities of freelance war correspondent, Jon Stephenson, raise real fears that the evil represented by Bagram's torture chambers is on the point of infecting New Zealand.
 
THE BAGRAM DETENTION FACILITY was a dark lake of evil, its opaque depths constantly replenished by a thousand tributaries of officially-sanctioned moral depravity. Behind the razor-wire and watch-towers; beyond the foot patrols and guard-dogs; far away from the searchlight-beams and the constantly turning CCTV cameras; deeds were done in the name of our “very, very, very good friends” that only the sickest kind of sadist could observe with equanimity.
 
To the people of Afghanistan, the innocent as well as the guilty, Bagram became a byword for terror, torture, and the exercise of all the other brutal forms of utterly unaccountable American power.
 
In March of this year the Bagram Detention Facility, located within the sprawling American airbase of the same name, was handed over to the Afghan Government. It is now known as the Afghan National Detention Facility – proof – according to the American commander of the International Security Assistance Force, General Joseph Dunford, of ISAF’s success in building “an increasingly confident, capable and sovereign Afghanistan.”
 
Shortly before the formal handover, however, an undisclosed number of prisoners were allegedly moved to a new US-controlled facility – still located within the perimeter wire of the airbase – and known simply as the “Black Prison”. Former detainees also report that US personnel continue to have “access” to the prisoners (or what’s left of them) being held under Afghanistan’s putative authority.
 
The New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) still has military intelligence personnel stationed at Bagram Airbase. A former NZDF resident describes it in terms of a small American town uplifted in its entirety and relocated within sight of the snow-capped peaks of the Hindu Kush. She did not reveal the purpose of her posting.
 
But now, thanks to the extraordinary investigative journalism of Nicky Hager, we all know what at least one of New Zealand’s military and intelligence personnel was doing at Bagram Airbase. He or she was spying on another of this country’s extraordinary investigative journalists (and our only war correspondent worthy of the name) Jon Stephenson.
 
Jon’s stories from Afghanistan, stripped of all their incidental detail, have been about only one thing: the contagion of evil.
 
Over and over again he has revealed how sending good-hearted New Zealand soldiers to Afghanistan, a war that was, most probably, initiated illegally, and which has, most certainly, been conducted immorally, was bound to result in their slow but certain corruption.
 
The most vivid confirmation of evil’s contagious effect came in Jon’s award-winning Metro magazine article, “Eyes Wide Shut”, in which he detailed how New Zealand’s troops had repeatedly been obliged to hand over prisoners to US and Afghan authorities, in whose custody, the Kiwis were reasonably sure, they would be subjected to assault and torture.
 
It was through the increasingly desperate attempts of the NZDF to deny that these events ever happened, and then to discredit the journalist whose detailed and highly accurate reportage constantly undermined those efforts, that some of Bagram’s evil began flowing into the bloodstream of the New Zealand body politic.
 
Nicky Hager’s story reveals an NZDF so rattled by Jon Stephenson’s investigative reporting that its own security manual included “certain investigative journalists” among its most dangerous antagonists. Or, in Mr Hager’s own words, putting probing journalists up there “on the same list as the KGB and al Qaeda.”
 
Both affronted and alarmed by Jon Stephenson’s unrelenting reportage, the NZDF turned to the Americans’ vast intelligence-gathering operation for assistance. They also enlisted the aid of New Zealand’s principal security and intelligence gathering agency, the SIS, to root out the journalist’s contacts and sources.
 
To the NZDF, Stephenson was no longer simply a conscientious journalist attempting to inform his fellow citizens of their government’s actions and hold it to account. He was now regarded as a “subversive”: someone determined to “weaken the military, economic or political strength of a nation by undermining the morale, loyalty or reliability of its citizens.”
 
Here we see the contagion of evil in all its chilling menace.
 
Telling the truth has become a subversive act. Informing the public that their soldiers are at risk of becoming embroiled in acts contrary to international law – to war crimes – is now tantamount to aiding the enemy: to treason.
 
And so, drop by drop, the Bagram poison enters our system. Our Government, determined to avoid further embarrassment by “certain investigative journalists” intends to empower our own Government Communications Security Bureau to assist the NZDF in tracking-down and identifying their sources.
 
As they did in Afghanistan, they will use the latest intelligence-gathering technology to acquire “metadata” – landline and cellphone logs, e-mail and text traffic - to identify the likes of Jon Stephenson’s and Nicky Hager’s friends and associates; contacts and sources.
 
Among them will be my own name and telephone numbers.
 
Bagram will have come home. The contagion of evil will be at my door.
 
This essay was originally published in The Press of Tuesday, 30 July 2013.

12 comments:

  1. "Among them will be my own name and telephone numbers”

    Not to mention anyone who leaves a comment on your blog, or at The Standard, Daily Blog etc

    ReplyDelete
  2. Please Chris alter the system to prove you are not a robot. Half the time it is impossible to work out what I am supposed to write - well to these old tired eyes that is

    ReplyDelete
  3. If I could, Patricia, I would.

    The blog belongs to Google - the rules are theirs not mine.

    If anyone has any ideas - feel free to pass them on.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that you are right here Chris. A society which is healthy must do what it is able to limit the capacity for evil.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You are right Chris. A healthy society must do what it is able to limit the capacity for its technologies to be used for evil purposes.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I dislike this government and everything it stands for.
    I'm happy to stand up and be counted and I'm easy enough to find...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Come on. The army's always been right wing. What would you expect them to say? :-).

    ReplyDelete
  8. Chris,simply by you changing a couple of settings you can rid this wonderful blog of needing commentors to prove they are not a robot.
    There is a setting that allows publication of the comment after your approval. It's simple and removes having to identify these inane letters which can be so difficult to decifer...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nothing changes much,does it? Just the name of the President of the United States.

    Where is the proof of the goings on?

    I would like to see them.

    ReplyDelete
  10. How about we all advise the military that we are subversives and give them our address and phone number? We could tell them we are saving them time!

    And no code to decipher. Wonderful.

    ReplyDelete
  11. During the 1984-5 miners' strike in the UK, the miners' leaders knew their phones were tapped. I heard that, on pre-arranged occasions, they would all pick up their phones simultaneously and start uttering the various 'key words' that would initiate the tape recorders - strike, protest, scabs, flying picket, police riot, etc.

    If nothing else it would have really pissed off MI5.

    I wonder if it would be possible to fill the present day surveillance systems with similar 'protest spam'. Or are the data mining systems too smart for such naive forms of protest?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Chris, here is an idea....BE's blog works fine :)

    ReplyDelete