Signed, Sealed, Delivered - I'm Yours! The Governor of New Zealand, the Earl of Liverpool, prepares to read the message from the King-Emperor, George V, which officially signalled this country's participation in the First World War. A conflict that would, ultimately, claim the lives of 18,000 young New Zealanders.
HOW DO YOU THINK New Zealand went to war in August 1914? No,
this is not an operational question about military units, points of embarkation
and troop carriers. What’s being asked here is a constitutional question.
Essentially, by what process were New Zealanders impelled into a state of war?
Did Parliament declare war on Germany? Were the ties of
empire invoked? Was the German Emperor’s dismissal of Belgium’s 1839 Treaty of
Neutrality as a mere “scrap of paper” held up by the then Prime Minister, Bill
Massey, as an indisputable casus belli
– cause for war? Were the Members of New Zealand’s Legislative Council and House
of Representatives enjoined to stand by their King-Emperor and commit the
Dominion’s armed forces to helping Britannia put Germany’s upstart Kaiser back
in his box?
Massey’s conservative Reform Party would certainly have
voted for war. But what about the Opposition? Would the Liberal Party leader,
Joseph Ward, have dared oppose Britain, France and Russia’s war with Germany? Not
likely. With an election looming in December, Ward would, almost certainly,
have thought it better to play the “national unity” card.
After all, the Liberal Party had not been defeated at the
ballot-box. Bill Massey was Prime Minister only because, two years earlier, he
had managed to carry a Vote of No Confidence against Ward’s predecessor. Reform
was desperate for a popular mandate – especially after the divisive events of
1912-13.
Which is why, on the question of whether or not to join Mr
Asquith’s War, Ward would undoubtedly have thought it best to allow no daylight
at all between his own party’s position and the Government’s. (And it very
nearly worked: the 1914 General Election, which Massey won, was one of the
closest in New Zealand’s political history.)
But the Liberals were not the only occupants of the
Opposition Benches in August 1914. Alfred Hindmarsh’s United Labour Party had
two votes to cast – as did the new, more left-wing, Social Democrats. What
would Paddy Webb, the firebrand socialist from the West Coast seat of Grey,
have to say about New Zealand joining an imperialist war? And James McCombs,
the SDP Member for Lyttelton? Why would a left-wing intellectual, and the newly-elected
representative of Lyttelton’s working-class, vote for a war between Kings and Kaisers?
The truth is, we shall never know how the New Zealand
Parliament would have voted on the question of whether to join Great Britain,
the French Republic and the Russian Empire in a war against Germany and
Austria-Hungary – for the very simple reason that all the key decisions that
led New Zealand into the First World War were made in London – not Wellington.
The Governor: Arthur William de Brito Savile Foljambe, Fifth Earl of Liverpool.
New Zealanders officially learned that they were at war
Germany and Austria-Hungary only when, on 5 August 1914, the Governor of New
Zealand, one Arthur William de Brito Savile Foljambe, fifth Earl of Liverpool, stood
upon the steps of Parliament, in front of a crowd of 15,000 Wellingtonians, and
read the following missive from the King-Emperor, George V.
“I desire to express to my people of the Overseas Dominions
with what appreciation and pride I have received the messages from their
respective Governments during the last few days. These spontaneous assurances
of their fullest support recall to me the generous self-sacrificing help given
by them in the past to the Mother Country. I shall be strengthened in the
discharge of the great responsibilities which rest upon me by the confident
belief in this time of trial my Empire will stand united, calm, resolute,
trusting in God.”
To which the Governor, Liverpool, responded:
“New Zealand desires me to acknowledge Your Majesty’s
gracious message, and to say that come good or ill she, in company with the
other dominions and dependencies of the Crown, is prepared to make any
sacrifice to maintain her heritage and her birthright.”
And that was that. Flanked by the Speakers of the
Legislative Council and the House of Representatives, and with the Judges of
the Supreme Court and an assortment of MPs providing him with a fine patriotic
backdrop, the Governor acknowledged the cheers of the King-Emperor’s subjects
and returned to Government House.
Liverpool’s words were very far from being empty. In the
years ahead, and in the company of “the other dominions and dependencies of the
Crown”, New Zealand would send nearly a tenth of her population – 100,000 young
men – to “maintain her heritage and her birthright” as a member in good
standing of the British Empire. Fully 18,000 of that terrible tithe of New
Zealand’s population would lose their lives in the service of King-Emperor, and
a further 41,000 would be wounded.
Exactly how Liverpool, the man who in October 1913 – less
than a year earlier – had authorised the deployment of military and naval
personnel - "Massey's Cossacks" - to suppress what came to be known as the “Great Strike”, was in any
position to know what “New Zealand” thought about sending her sons to war is
difficult to discern. There had been no debate by those “New Zealand” had elected
to represent her. Nor is it clear by whose leave Liverpool authorised the
making of “any sacrifice” in the name of victory. Not a single vote had been
taken.
Amidst all the commemorations, and all the tearful
invocations of the 18,000 young men who did not “grow old, as we that are left
grow old”, it is as well to remember that it is not in the monarchical tradition
to ask the King’s (or the Queen’s) subjects if they want to – let alone whether
they should! – go to war. It remains a matter for the “Executive” alone.
This is as true today, as a much smaller force of New
Zealand soldiers prepares to depart for the Middle East, as it was in 1914,
when thousands of volunteers embarked for their fateful rendezvous with terror,
disfigurement and death on the sheer slopes of Gallipoli.
A version of this
essay was originally posted on The Daily Blog of Monday, 20 April 2015.
Amen.
ReplyDelete