A Blast From The Past: It is nothing short of astonishing that Bill Sutton, the former Rogernome who aggressively countered the Fourth Labour Government’s critics with the assertion, “There is no alternative!”, is still unable to connect the dots between an economic and political system which insists that it represents the terminus of history, and the rising levels of political disillusionment and despair.
BILL SUTTON, a Labour politician of the 1980s, was the butt
of one of David Lange’s most vicious jokes. Like so many of Labour’s “Class of
‘84”, Sutton was a Rogernome. Swept-up in the tornado of change unleashed by
Labour’s Finance Minister, Roger Douglas, he and his colleagues found
themselves, by the beginning of the Fourth Labour Government’s second term,
dangerously off-side with both their prime minister and their party. By 1988
the divisions within Labour had grown to the point where Lange felt besieged by
upwards of half his own caucus. Bill Sutton was one of the more outspoken of
the prime minister’s critics.
This was the context in which Lange quipped to reporters
that Bill Sutton’s much-needed brain transplant had been delayed because his
doctors hadn’t been able to find a compatible rabbit.
Not many politicians come back from a crack like that.
Certainly, few were surprised when Sutton’s “marginal seat” of Hawkes Bay –
along with a great many others – returned to its more natural shade of deep
Tory blue in 1990. In a few years, Bill Sutton had become just another former
MP whose name, outside of Hawkes Bay, had been forgotten by everyone except
political train-spotters.
As a member of that querulous fraternity, however, I simply
had to discover whether the Bill Sutton whose Hawkes Bay Today/NZ Herald
opinion piece I’d spotted in Dr Bryce Edward’s inestimable “New Zealand Politics Daily”, was the Bill Sutton – David Lange’s incompatible rabbit.
It was. And the title of his commentary, “Politics Has
Changed For The Worse”, was more than interesting enough for me to click on the
link. After all, if politics isn’t what it used to be, then its Rogernomes like
Bill Sutton who must shoulder a fairly large share of the blame.
Not that there’s a single contrite word in the entire piece
about the ongoing social and economic effects of the “reforms” of the Fourth
Labour Government. Although a scientist by profession, Sutton was never able to
grasp that, for all its pretentions to the contrary, economics owes almost
nothing to the scientific method. The whole so-called “discipline” has always
been, and remains, a sub-set of politics – hence its original designation as
“Political Economy”.
I always got the impression that Sutton saw Rogernomics as
an expression of natural law, like gravity. Certainly, he was one of the most
tireless repeaters of TINA – the “There Is No Alternative” mantra which
Douglas’s defenders dutifully deployed against the growing number of critics of
the Fourth Labour Government’s economic “revolution”.
Thirty years on, however, Sutton (a published poet) is
acutely aware that something has gone wrong with New Zealand politics – and
society. As he observes, plaintively: “in the 1980s it was still possible for
people with good jobs and supportive families to set these aside, and seek election
to Parliament, in the hope of changing New Zealand for the better. And even
within a conservative electorate like Hawke's Bay, it was possible to persuade
a narrow majority of voters to agree.”
Not anymore.
“That would be inconceivable today, because New Zealand
politics has changed, and not for the better. Steadily fewer people are
bothering to vote, significant numbers don't even get their names on to the
electoral roll, and those who still do these things have fewer expectations
about changing anything. The best that most voters today are hoping for is a
government that won't make things any worse. What a discouraging prospect for
potential candidates!”
It is nothing short of astonishing that the man who
aggressively countered his government’s critics with the assertion, “There is
no alternative!”, is unable to connect the dots between an economic and
political system which insists that it represents the terminus of history, and
the rising levels of political disillusionment and despair. If this, the
neoliberal world order, is as good as it gets; and if all the truly meaningful
decision-making powers have been taken out of the hands of politicians; then
what, in God’s name, is the point of casting a vote?
How does Sutton explain this lamentable demise of the democratic spirit?
Oh, that’s easy. The steady decline in political engagement is just “one tiny
part of a global phenomenon, the move away from representative democracy
towards its only proven alternative: rule by power-hungry despots, who brook no
disagreement, even from their supporters, and are ready to resort to whatever
means seem necessary to shore up their power.”
Ummm, no, Bill. I don’t think so. The malaise you describe
is traceable to the hollowing-out of our political institutions which began
with the very same reforms you were so proud to champion as a young MP in the
Lange-led Labour Government. The reforms which caused the Labour Party to
shrink from a party numbering close to 100,000 members to one numbering fewer
than 10,000. The reforms which gave birth to a professionally-trained political
class, whose members glide effortlessly between the public service, the news
media, public-relations and Parliament, and who have nothing but contempt for
the opinions of ordinary people.
People haven’t “moved away from representative democracy”,
Mr Sutton, representative democracy has been moved away from them. A necessary
precaution, lest ordinary people get it into their heads to take on the
greatest “power-hungry despot” of them all: the totalitarian ideology we call
Neoliberalism.
The despot you helped to enthrone, Mr Sutton. The reason why
New Zealand politics has changed so profoundly for the worse.
This essay was
originally posted on The Daily Blog
of Friday, 9 March 2018.
