Just Following Orders: None of the awfulness associated with Family Court "Uplift" orders exposed by Melanie Reid and Newsroom would be possible without the active assistance and institutional protection afforded to Oranga Tamariki by the nation’s DHBs. These latter, through their security and communications staff, are, in almost every case, able to ensure that the tragedies unfolding within their walls are never reported beyond them.
IT IS DIFFICULT to know where to begin with Melanie Reid’s
and Newsroom’s latest investigation into Oranga Tamariki. In the same way that
David Lynch’s movie “Blue Velvet” begins with a single shocking discovery,
which leads the hero deeper and deeper into a corrupt and violent world; Reid’s
45-minute video, “New Zealand’s Own ‘Taken Generation’”, exposes the viewer to
aspects of life in this country that, until this week, have been quite
deliberately, and ruthlessly, kept hidden from the public. That this
collaborative act of concealment (involving, as it does, not only the child
welfare services, but also the Family Court, the DHBs and the Police) has been
so successful for so long is due, almost entirely, to the fact that its victims
are members of the Maori underclass.
Reid estimates that the “uplift” of Maori children from
their biological parents by child welfare social workers – often assisted by
the Police – is occurring at least three times a week. The removal of these
children, who range in age from just a few days to 14 years, is authorised by
Family Court orders which, astonishingly, permit the use of “reasonable force”
to separate parents from their children. That this regularly involves burly
police officers carrying distraught and screaming children from their family
home is a fact which Oranga Tamariki is very keen to keep from the public.
“Oranga Tamariki”: the name itself is proof of our deeply
cynical state’s capacity for misrepresentation. In English, the words “child
welfare” carry overtones that are far from positive. By giving this
oft-criticised and disgraced government department a Maori name, the
bureaucrat’s responsible clearly hoped to bury those negative connotations
while, at the same time, conveying a “Maori friendly” message to impoverished
Maori communities which had every reason to expect the opposite.
The cynicism doesn’t stop there, however. At the sharp end
of Oranga Tamariki’s enforcement operations; especially, it would seem, child
uplifts; it has become a case of Maori versus Maori. Acutely aware of
how bad it would look to have middle-class Pakeha social workers ripping babies
from the arms of their Maori birth mothers, the department has recruited Maori
social workers to do the job for them.
Played out in Reid’s story is the bleak spectacle of Maori
women in the employ of Oranga Tamariki confronting the angry and (in most
circumstances) powerless whanau of the child about to be uplifted from its
terrified mother. Throughout Reid’s harrowing video, the viewer is acutely
aware that, if the recorded interactions had not been unfolding in the presence
of an award-winning Pakeha journalist and a courageous pair of Maori midwives –
linked by cell-phone to a seasoned lawyer – then the 19 year-old mum at the
centre of the drama would have lost her second child to the same British couple
who, with Oranga Tamariki’s help, had been entrusted with her first.
None of this awfulness would be possible, of course, without
the active assistance and institutional protection afforded to Oranga Tamariki
by the nation’s DHBs. These latter, through their security and communications
staff, are, in almost every case, able to ensure that the tragedies unfolding
within their walls are never reported beyond them. The clear priority of the
DHBs is to ensure that the media “protocols” protecting the blissful ignorance
of “Middle New Zealand” are strictly enforced. The sheer ruthlessness with
which they go about facilitating these uplift operations is one of the most
frightening of Reid’s revelations.
The men and women I feel most sorry for (apart, obviously,
from the mother and child and their whanau) are the police officers brought in
to enforce the Family Court’s uplift orders. I do not imagine that many of them
signed-up to rip babies from their mother’s arms. Nor can it be easy to tell
anguished whanau members that they will be arrested if they do not accept
Oranga Tamariki’s faits accomplis. Moreover, these uplifts are,
potentially, extremely dangerous situations. The police officers involved have
every right to fear assault, or worse, when emotions are running so high. That
they are being deliberately inserted into such highly-charged confrontations,
at least three times a week across the country, is unconscionable.
This is the enormous virtue of Reid’s and Newsroom’s
investigative journalism. It digs below the superficial stereotypes that allow
so many of us to dismiss the anguish of “these people” as the inevitable
outcome of their irresponsible lifestyles. That they are brown and say “yous”,
instead of “you”, only makes it easier for middle-class Pakeha to ignore their
pain. Oranga Tamariki, the Family Court, the DHBs and the Police have made it
possible for those Kiwis who have made their peace with race-based social
injustice to go about their lives without the slightest awareness of the
tragedies unfolding, every night, in suburbs they will never visit.
Reid and Newsroom are, of course, already feeling the lash
of official displeasure. Oranga Tamariki are attempting to force edits in
Reid’s video. The Hawkes Bay DHB has chastised one of its board members for
daring to speak out against the incident recorded by Reid and her
camera-operator. The Minister for Children, Tracey Martin, is unapologetic: the
uplifts, she says, will continue. The Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, is
conflicted. Reid’s footage depicts a world a long, long way from the “politics
of kindness”.
But, you know, Jacinda, this is what poverty looks like.
This is what it does. This is what it requires. Our ignorance may have been
blissful, but now we know, and that knowledge demands action – from all of us.
This essay was originally posted on The Daily Blog
of Wednesday, 12 June 2019.
