Troopers of the NZ Machine Gun Squadron, NZ Mounted Rifles Brigade,
Palestine, 1918.
The
shocking events described by Nicky Hager and Jon Stephenson in Hit and Run: The
New Zealand SAS in Afghanistan and the Meaning of Honour are not without precedent in the history of New Zealand’s military
engagements overseas. In the tiny Palestinian village of Surafend, in the final
days of 1918, New Zealand troops participated in what was indisputably a serious
war crime. The parallels with the SAS “Revenge Raid” of August 2010 are
striking. The Surafend Massacre was also sparked by the killing of a New
Zealand soldier. It, too, was a
murderous “fiasco”, the details of which were kept from the New Zealand
public for many years. This, as best as I can determine, is what happened.
THE WAR WAS
OVER. At the eleventh hour, on the eleventh day, of the eleventh month 1918,
the fighting ceased. For the men of the New Zealand Machine Gun Squadron, and
all the other troopers of the New Zealand Mounted Rifle Brigade encamped among
the barren sandhills of central Palestine, that single fact was all that
mattered.
But, as the
weeks passed, the war’s end, while obviously a source of immense relief, had
also become the cause of intense frustration. Now that their job was done; now
that the killing had stopped; now that they had survived; all these men wanted
to do was go home.
WHEN Trooper Leslie
Lowry pulled his kit-bag under his head on the night of 9 December 1918 it was
to home that his thoughts inevitably wandered. Wrapped in his blanket to ward
off the late autumn chill, he lay motionless beneath the low canvass ceiling of
his tent thinking of New Zealand until, lulled by the companionable snorting of
the tethered horses, he drifted off to sleep.
An hour later he awoke
with a start to feel his kit-bag/pillow being unceremoniously yanked from under
his head. He scrambled out of the tent, stumbling in the sand as he pulled on
his trousers, and shouting at the top of his voice to the men on sentry duty:
“Stop him! Stop that
little bastard – he’s stolen my kit-bag!”
The thief was clearly
visible in the moonlight, weaving in and out of the thorn bushes that dotted
the sandhills.
Trooper Lowry had
always been a good runner and he proved it now by sprinting after his quarry
like a huntaway. Within seconds he’d caught up with the man who’d stolen his
property.
“You give that back –
you thieving little swine!”
For a moment the New
Zealander and the Palestinian faced each other, breathing heavily. In the
distance both of them could hear the shouts of the alerted sentries and the
alarmed whinnying of the horses.
“Come on mate,” said
Lowry, speaking in what he hoped was a more reasonable tone, “you’re not going
anywhere. Hand it over.”
The Palestinian said
nothing. Instead, he reached into the folds of his caftan and pulled out a
heavy Webly revolver, retrieved six months earlier from the corpse of a British
officer. Pointing it at the New Zealander’s chest – he fired.
Lowry sank slowly to
his knees, hands fluttering uselessly as blood spouted from the neat little
hole in his chest, pouring out through his fingers and down over his bare
stomach. Without a word he toppled over onto his side, an awkward, quivering
bundle in the cold sand.
The Palestinian turned
and ran off into the darkness.
THE news of trooper
Lowry’s death spread rapidly – and its effect was devastating. For a man to
have come through everything the NZ Mounted Rifles had endured, only to be
murdered by an Arab thief just weeks before sailing for home, was almost too
much for his comrades to bear.
“He was unarmed for
Christ’s sake! The thief must have seen that. What kind of man calmly shoots an
unarmed man, at point-blank range, for the sake of a bloody kit-bag?”
“We’re not going to
take this lying down – I don’t care what the Heads say. This is too bloody
much. Come on you blokes, it should be easy enough to track the bastard through
all this sand. Look! – there are his footprints!
“You three, go back
and round up the rest of the Squadron – and see if you can get some of the
Aussies from the Light Horse to join us. We’re going to track this murdering
bastard back to the hole he came from and cork it up tight. Make sure he’s
still there in the morning when the Red-Caps arrive.”
The thief’s footprints
led the New Zealanders and their Australian allies across the sand to the
nearby Palestinian village of Surafend. Within the hour they had set up a tight
military cordon around the cluster of stone houses: no one was permitted to
enter or leave.
THE morning light came
slanting down into the village of Surafend and illuminated the faces of the New
Zealand and Australian troopers encircling it. But the rising sun brought no
Military Police. Indeed, having being informed of the murder of Trooper Lowry
and the situation at Surafend by the Australian and New Zealand Divisional
Commander, Major-General Edward Chaytor, General Headquarters had peremptorily
ordered the cordon lifted. There would be no official investigation, no Red
Caps, no arrests. By the afternoon of 10 December all the troopers who had
surrounded Surafend were back behind their tent-lines, allowing a steady stream
of Palestinian men to make their way out of the village without hindrance.
Trooper Lowry’s comrades
were furious.
“I don’t believe this
– I simply don’t believe this! How can the bloody British just sit there,
knowing that a soldier of the Empire has been murdered, and do nothing about
it?”
“You know the Heads.
There’ll be some behind-the-scenes skulduggery between the British and that
Arab king Lawrence has been squiring around. The last thing they want is any
‘unpleasantness’ – nothing to upset the ‘delicate diplomacy’ between His
Majesty’s Government and the leaders of the Arab tribes. What’s one Kiwi
digger’s life compared to ‘the future of the Middle East?’”
“It’s just like that
bloody fiasco at Ain Es Sir – remember? When our lot were sent back to help the
Circassians and the ungrateful little bastards ambushed us. Nobody did anything
about the men they killed there either.”
“Well that’s not going
to happen this time. I’ve been talking to the men. They’re ready to do
something on their own. And there’s a swag of blokes in the Light Horse who’ll
join us. The Aussies are as sick of this turning a blind eye to theft and
murder as we are. I hear there’s even a few Brits willing to do their bit.”
“Do what?”
“We’re going to pay
the village of Surafend a little visit. And if they refuse to hand over the
bastard who shot Les, we’ll administer some justice of our own – ANZAC-style.”
THERE was fear in the
eyes of the women, children and old men of Surafend as they were assembled in
front of the village well. These strange men from distant lands said little,
but their gestures were clear enough. Holding the pick-axe handles they were
carrying with both hands, they pushed and prodded the little huddle in the direction
they wanted them to travel – out of the village and up into the sandhills. One
of the old men pleaded with his grim shepherds.
“We are friends,” he
cried in heavily accented English, “friends of the British.”
“You may be friends of
the British,” hissed one of the troopers, pushing the old man back into the
huddle, “but you’re no friends of ours.”
“Keep them well back!”
Someone shouted. “Well back.”
From the crest of the
big sandhill overlooking Surafend, the little huddle watched as around 200
troopers closed in on their homes. In addition to pick-axe handles, the New
Zealanders and Australians were armed with the heavy, canvass-sheathed chains
used to haul supply wagons and field guns. They were eerily silent, and the
expressions their faces wore were hard – very hard.
“We want the man who
shot Trooper Leslie Lowry.” The leader of the troopers was speaking slowly and
very clearly to the village headman. “We tracked him to this village. If he’s
not here, we want to know where we can find him. Lead us to him, now, and
nothing will happen to you and your people. Refuse, and ….” The trooper cast a
meaningful glance at the mute formation drawn up behind him.”
The Palestinian looked
into the eyes of the New Zealander standing before him. Neither man moved a
muscle. Then, drawing himself up to his full height, the headman leaned forward
to within a few inches of the New Zealander’s face, and speaking in a clear
voice so all the men of his village could hear, he said:
“Get your infidel dogs
out of my village!”
And spat in the
trooper’s face.
A roar, deep and
guttural, leapt from the throats of all the men present, and both sides lunged
towards the other. The troopers swung their pick-axe handles high and brought
them down with deadly force. The heavy chains hissed and whistled. The air was
filled with the sickening sound of wood and metal connecting with human bone
and tissue. Men screamed, fell, and lay still, but still the Palestinians
continued to hurl themselves upon the troopers.
“Allahu Akbar! They
cried. “God is Great!”
“Get them! Get the
bastards!” Shouted the troopers.
From a distance it was
all-too-clear how the fight would end. The villagers were outnumbered and the
troopers superior training and discipline easily overcame their furious resistance.
Slowly, methodically, the New Zealanders and the Australians beat and beat and
beat. The pick-axe handles rising and falling like some vast threshing machine.
Soon the village was
ablaze. The contents of the stone-walled houses burned fiercely, bathing the
whole scene in a lurid glow. As their men fell, the women up on the sandhill
began a high keening. The children, seeing the fathers and brothers being
beaten to death, sobbed uncontrollably.
By the time the
troopers tired of their grim sport, thirty Palestinian men lay dead or wounded
on the bloody sand. As the rising wind swirled the smoke and cinders into the
night sky, the New Zealanders and Australians formed up in ranks and, without a
backward glance, marched out into the darkness of the sandhills.
The village of
Surafend had ceased to exist.
NO New Zealand or
Australian soldier was ever charged as a result of the Surafend Massacre. The
British High Command was furious at what could only be considered a diplomatic
disaster in terms of the British Empire’s relations with the Arab peoples.
The borders of the
Middle East were in the process of being redrawn, and the gentlemen at the
Foreign and Colonial Office in London were determined that this process should
not rebound to the Empire’s disadvantage.
There can be little
doubt that the military authorities would very much have liked to punish the
ringleaders, but the troopers and the junior officers of the NZ Mounted Rifles
and the Australian Light Horse closed ranks against all investigation.
In the end it was left
to the British Commander-in-Chief, Major-General Edmund Allenby, to state the
views of His Majesty’s Egyptian Expeditionary Force. Forming the ANZAC’s into a
hollow square he unleashed a tongue-lashing the like of which no British or
Empire troops had heard for many, many years:
“I was proud of you as
brave soldiers but now I am ashamed of you as cold-blooded murderers.”
This outburst aroused
such mutinous resentment among the New Zealand and Australian troops that
Allenby was soon forced to retract his words.
It was a necessary
concession because with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the US
President, Woodrow Wilson’s, promise of “self-determination” for the world’s
subject peoples, the British soon had their hands full keeping the Arab
population of the region from breaking out into full scale rebellion. In this
task the brutal reputation of the Australian and New Zealand troopers rode
before them, striking fear into the hearts of the Arab population wherever they
appeared.
UNFORTUNATELY, there
was no Nicky Hager, no Jon Stephenson, to write an exhaustive account of the
Surafend tragedy for the New Zealand public of 1918. Bill Massey’s deeply
authoritarian government, having expended the blood of thousands of young New
Zealanders in the cause of Britain’s empire, was not about to sanction a full
and independent investigation into a war crime perpetrated by his own troops.
As far as Massey’s stridently imperialistic government was concerned, the
“boys” of the New Zealand Mounted Rifle Brigade were heroes – blameless heroes.
The closest “official”
New Zealand ever came to acknowledging the Surafend Massacre was in the bare summary
of the event written by, Lieutenant-Colonel C. Guy Powles, author of The New
Zealanders in Sinai and Palestine, the third volume of the Official History of
New Zealand’s Effort in the Great War, published by the New Zealand Government
in 1922.
Of the bloody evening
of 10 December 1918, Powles writes:
“While the brigade was
camped in the vicinity of Richon le Zion a disturbance occurred in the
divisional area following the murder of a New Zealander, during which a village
and an Arab camp were burned and some 30 Arabs killed and injured ….. It
appears that the murdered man’s comrades, feeling aggrieved that the murderer
was not immediately brought to book, went to the village and demanded his
surrender. They were met by an insolent answer from the head man of the village
so they determined to find him and the searching of the houses led to a
collision with the natives which resulted in a riot.”
Powles also notes,
drily: “[A]t the [subsequent] inquiry it was found impossible to get any
evidence as to who took part in the disturbance.”
Then, as now, the New
Zealand military authorities preferred to bury their mistakes beneath a
crushing mountain of official silence.
This essay was originally posted on The Daily Blog of Wednesday, 22 March 2017.
7 comments:
Tell me Sir,
What reaction would you recommend to the murder of a man?
What a spurious question, and truncated:
Tell me Sir,
What reaction would you recommend to the murder of a man?
The point is Mr webster - how does a soldier and the controllers of such fighting force conduct a hostile campaign against a person or persons with intent to restrain, commit violence against them personally, and damage their possessions and land, and maim them and their helpers and the equipment and buildings that enable them to live, or kill them outright or hurt them and leave them to die - after consideration of those behaviours from which most people of goodwill and ethics recoil, do the attacked people respond?
Do they not recoil also, then feel anger and if one of them kills one of the invading force intent upon destroying and damaging, are the invaders not man enough to accept there will be casualties on their side, no retaliation of some sort? Do the invaders not accept that they are behaving in an ungentlemanly way, as denoted in the best books of etiquett.
Where's Wayne?
I have seen somewhere that the soldiers were already fed up with continual thieving from the villagers when the murder happened. They had very happy relationships with the Jewish settlers in Richon Le Zion.
I believe that Australians in wars are very good at thieving from the people in whose country they are fighting. Of course NZs would never yield to that temptation even if they were hungry and stressed./sarc
I wonder why Palestinians would go against the proper rules of war and occupation and do such underhand things as stealing, pilfering, thieving etc? What lunatic responses are arising Chris to your detailed tale of another war story carried out for spurious reasons against people largely helpless against aggression.
The problem is that we are no more able to help ourselves than the Palestinians if it suits some large conglomerate to occupy us for gain of resources or location. Oh hell, we are experiencing that already without the costly damaging effects of armaments and skirmishes. Never mind we will keep on looking and honouring 1915 and WW1 and the noble sacrifices of ordinary men and women holding the invaders at bay and never notice how they have adopted guerilla tactics and tunnelled under our simple defences in NZ with the help of our own Vichy government.
"I have seen somewhere that the soldiers were already fed up with continual thieving from the villagers when the murder happened."
Oh – that makes it all right then.
My father, and several of my friends' fathers served in the Middle East in World War II. They seem to have to some extent mitigated their response to theft a little, because they realised that the people were dirt poor. Although they sometimes seem to have played quite nasty tricks on the thieves they tended to handle it with humour rather than violence. Not a huge statistical sample I will admit though. One story my dad used to tell was of shoeshine kids in Egypt, who if you refused to let them shine your shoes Would flick a dollop of liquid black polish all over your dress whites. So they used to carry around a pocket full of loose change in small denominations, which they would throw in one direction and run in the other to escape. Which by the standards of the day was probably quite enlightened. It's quite possible that violence was done, but not at all on this scale.
Post a Comment