Admonishing Angel: Nicky Hager descends periodically to trouble our consciences and wreak merry havoc with the orderly conduct of our political affairs. But, more than any other journalist in New Zealand, he has taught us to read the actions of those who wield power over and around us in the twenty-first century.
WHAT WILL HISTORY MAKE of Nicky Hager? That slight,
perpetually boyish, journalist who descends periodically, like the admonishing
angel in a medieval mystery play, to trouble our consciences and wreak merry
havoc with the orderly conduct of our political affairs. History will have to
make something of him: his interventions have been too important to be
dismissed by our political brewers as mere irrelevant froth. But what? That is
the question.
Perhaps we should begin by telling the world what Nicky
Hager is not. Prime Ministerial judgements notwithstanding, he is not “a
screaming left-wing conspiracy-theorist”.
Hager has never, is not, and never will be some sort of
avatar of the “left-wing”. He has far too refined a moral sense to be the
representative of anything so fractious and morally compromised as the New
Zealand Left. Indeed, most left-wingers have little patience for individuals so
weighed down by self-imposed scruples. The preferred left-wing soldier is as
reluctant to question the ethics of the party-line as Hager is eager to
challenge them. Revolutionary bread is typically made from much more
coarsely-ground flour.
Nor does Hager scream. His mode of address is invariably
polite and carefully measured. Softly-spoken and slow to take offence, Hager is
actually the perfect foil for the genuine screamers of the public sphere. These
latter cannot abide the fact that Hager is able to inflict so much damage to
their cause while speaking in tones of such sweet reasonableness. One imagines
their camera lenses, microphones and keyboards flecked with spittle – so great
is the rage which he inspires.
Of all the epithets hurled at Hager, by far the most common
is that he is a “conspiracy theorist”. I recently heard one of Jim Mora’s
panellists, a woman who I would wager has never read a single one of his books,
dismiss him as “a grassy-knoll fantasist”. I was surprised she didn’t add that
he was generally to be found sporting a jaunty tin-foil hat!
Methinks the lady – and all those others so quick to dismiss
Hager’s work as the rantings of a demented conspiracy theorist – doth protest
too much. Such people cannot easily accept that what they happily acknowledge
as the truth of things may be something else entirely. That the “official”
story is, as often as not, a tissue of lies. Or, that the eruptions of
mendacity which periodically disturb the placid surface of public life are
anything other than unfortunate accidents: cock-ups – not conspiracies. Hager’s
books, so meticulously researched and footnoted, so weighed down with names and
dates and places, render the cock-up theory unusable by these poor souls,
forcing them to focus on facts as uncomfortable as they are irrefutable.
Unsurprisingly, he is not thanked for doing so.
Even more upset, however, are the people whose hidden
machinations (conspiracies if you like the word better) Hager exposes. Once
again, this is hardly surprising. Whether it be the people behind the Echelon
spy system; the timber company with its eyes on the native forests of the West
Coast; a Labour prime minister who’d neglected to alert the country to the
accidental release of genetically-engineered corn; the National Party
strategists behind Dr Don Brash’s bid to complete the neoliberal revolution;
the New Zealand Defence Force’s strenuous efforts to re-attach New Zealand’s
pinky finger to the Anglo-Saxon fist; or, All The Prime Minister’s Men’s e-mail
communications with Cameron Slater: these are people who would have preferred
their words and deeds to have remained hidden from the public gaze. “Conspiracy
theorist!”, in the mouths of such individuals is not a revelation, it’s a
diversion.
So what has Hager done? In historical terms, he has taught
us how to read the actions of those who wield power over and around us in the
twenty-first century. Since the publication of his first book, Secret Power, in 1996, Hager has shown
us things our leaders would rather we hadn’t seen. He’s taught us to challenge
the official media releases; to question the news stories; and to understand
the truth of British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli’s (1804-1881) disturbing
observation that: “The world is governed by very different personages from what
is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”
Hager is one of that rare breed of men with whom even
History is uncomfortable. He represents neither class nor creed; is the servant
of neither political party nor economic interest. He comes to us out of storms
of malice, steering his fragile little boat of truth across a raging sea of
lies. In the words of one of the nineteenth century’s greatest historians,
Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881) Nicky Hager is proof that:
“In the true Literary Man there is thus ever, acknowledged
or not by the world, a sacredness: he is the light of the world; the world’s
Priest – guiding it, like a sacred Pillar of Fire, in its dark pilgrimage
through the waste of Time.”
This essay was posted
simultaneously on the Daily Blog and Bowalley
Road blogsites on Wednesday, 27 August
2014.
6 comments:
Yes fine fellow doing a hard job etc ..... but does this not have to be read in the light of your previous column where you point out that we all should know this stuff goes on behind the scenes all the time, under every government and throughout the ages? And it's better than guns in the night etc..
And today it is way harder to keep secret so that is progress is it not?
Surely your friend would have more credibility if he wasn't entirely partisan and didn't launch his attack in an election campaign, clearly aiming not only to make lots of money from sales but to turn the election in his biased direction.
So no, I cannot see him as Saint Nicolas. Doing good work perhaps, but he's fatally flawed & history will almost ignore him I reckon.
I dont have the pleasure of knowing Nicky Hager but I suspect he is far too good for this world...fortunately.
He might be a conspiracy theorist, but he's uncovered a number of conspiracies :-). And if he is entirely partisan how did he manage to bugger up Helen's campaign in 2002 was it?
@Charles: Firstly Nicky timed his book to get maximum sales, a good marketing ploy of which you would be familiar.
Secondly, it SHOULD come out in an election so people can decide whether the person(s) are worthy of voting for. We need to know all the dirty dealings that are going on in the background.
Nicky is non-partisan as was shown by his revelations about the GM corn that almost cost Helen the win.
Now I have 1500 lettuce plants to put in the Market Garden.
@Charles "Entirely Partisan" & "Fatally flawed"??? Your opinion has nothing to do with your own partisanship ???
I am old enough to remember Watergate and for several months after the US put Nixon back in the issues were dismissed, distorted and called fiction before persistence by journalists with integrity toughed it out.
It takes brave writers and editors, and owners of media outlets but regardless of the coming election results I am catching the faint whiff of a smoking gun that leads to very difficult questions about honesty and integrity for Key. I think that we might well have our own Watergate by the end of the year when we find that he crossed the line between politics and legality.
I hope Nicky is made of the same stuff as Woodward and Bernstein and emerges from the hail of sour grapes to remind politicians that they are not above the law.
Post a Comment