Thursday, 24 October 2024

An Unending Nightmare.

Hate Will Find A Way: Historians divide into those who see Zionism as the only sane answer to the Jews’ historic vulnerability; and those who regard the Zionist “entity” as a purely colonial construct, founded in racism and shrouded in mythology. The moralists of both camps, meanwhile, demonstrate a capacity for joint-cracking contortions calculated to make a circus impresario’s mouth water.

ACROSS THE WORLD, Jews and Palestinians have been remembering the events of 7 October 2023 in very different ways. Israelis, still traumatised by the savagery of Hamas’s pogrom, struggle to visualise a purposeful future unmediated by the contradictory impulses of vengeance and security. The Palestinians of Gaza, shattered and broken by Israel’s relentless bombardment, sustain themselves with a potent mixture of indignation and hate – brewed in the caldron of their unending national nightmare.

The rest of the world has fallen in behind the flags of these bitter antagonists, each side decrying the dangerous “disinformation” of the other. Historians divide into those who see Zionism as the only sane answer to the Jews’ historic vulnerability; and those who regard the Zionist “entity” as a purely colonial construct, founded in racism and shrouded in mythology. The moralists of both camps, meanwhile, demonstrate a capacity for joint-cracking contortions calculated to make a circus impresario’s mouth water.

Perhaps the smallest group, after twelve months of blood, fire, and torment, are the optimists. These brave (or idiotic) souls still insist that a “two-state solution” is the only viable way out of the unceasing tragedy that is Israel/Palestine. As if 7 October 2023, and its aftermath, can somehow be set aside. As if the trauma-stricken judgement of Israelis and Palestinians can somehow be rendered sufficiently calm and dispassionate to envisage something other than the utter annihilation of the national enemy.

What, then, is the solution to this, the Devil’s own most treasured problem? Given its constitutive role in the Israel/Palestine impasse, history may not be the most obvious of guides. But, where else can we turn? There is no war in the present that was not conceived, and brought to term, in the past. What the world has been watching these past twelve months is nothing that the world hasn’t witnessed many, many times before.

In spite of appearances, no conflict is endless. Wars end. Peace is restored. How?

Let’s begin in the aftermath of the First World War. The Ottoman Empire lies in ruins. Far away, in the commune of Sèvres, on the outskirts of Paris, the victors have drawn up a treaty which shares what’s left of the Ottoman possessions (after the territories agreed upon by Monsieur Picot and Mr Sykes have been deducted) between France, Britain, Italy and Greece.

Encouraged by the British prime minister, David Lloyd-George, who dreamed, madly, of resurrecting Byzantium, the Greeks did their best to oblige him.

Mustapha Kemal, whom New Zealanders had learned to fear at Gallipoli, was having none of it. His Turkish troops drove the Greek invaders, quite literally, into the sea. But, not before the contending armies’ Muslim and Christian commanders had distinguished themselves by permitting/encouraging multiple atrocities against the inhabitants of the helpless faith communities their forces over-ran.

A new, and much revised, treaty having been signed and sealed, this time in the Swiss city of Lausanne, Kemal turned to the problem of what to do with all the Greeks who continued to live in his new Republic of Turkey (now Türkiye).

Too much blood had flowed under too many bridges for Turks and Greeks to co-exist peacefully, as they had done for centuries under the Ottomans.

Ever the ruthless problem-solver, Kemal determined to rid his new republic of Greeks – quietly encouraging the defeated Greeks to rid their own kingdom of Turks at the same time. The human-beings caught up in this first example of “ethnic cleansing” got no say in the matter. They were simply ordered to leave. Enterprising tourists can still visit the decaying ruins of settlements from which Christian Greeks and Muslim Turks were summarily uprooted and deported in the 1920s.

So successful was Kemal’s “solution”, that the victorious allies of World War II adopted it as the most efficient means of emptying the states of Eastern Europe of their numerous German-speaking communities. With the example of Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland before them, the Allies were in no mood to burden the region’s future with the witches’ brew of ethno-nationalism. The victims of Nazi oppression watched with cold eyes as millions of “displaced” Germans trudged westward. Few tears were shed.

The Palestinians insist that, in 1948, they, too, became the victims of ethnic cleansing. If true, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the Israelis made an uncharacteristically poor job of it.


This essay was originally published in The Otago Daily Times and The Greymouth Star of Friday, 11 October 2024.

5 comments:

John Hurley said...

Using Isaiah Berlin's analogy of the hedgehog and the fox: lee Kuan Yew was a fox and Helen Clark (and all the keffiyeh wearers) are hedgehogs. The hedgehog has one big idea, but the fox knows many things.

New view said...

Chris, Thanks for your take on the history of the Palestine area. Many details I wasn’t aware of but new the overall story. IMO the reason this conflict being endless is simply the way the state of Israel was created and of course where it was created. We all know why it was created, and for me completely justified. However the problem was Britain and it’s European Allies, whose actions created the opportunity for a Jewish state, didn’t care to ask those countries close by Israel, how they felt about a Jewish state, supported by the west, plonked in amongst a group of Muslim countries that didn’t want them there. The more the US and Britain supports Israel, the more those countries see Israel as a threat to their security, and the added indignity of Israel encroaching even more into what is known as Palestine. On top of that add in the tit for tat aggression from both sides and the thousands of lives lost there over the years and we can see why there is no end in sight.

Guerilla Surgeon said...

"The Palestinians insist that, in 1948, they, too, became the victims of ethnic cleansing. If true, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the Israelis made an uncharacteristically poor job of it"

If true? Their own historians have admitted to it. They made a poor job of it is simply a piece Zionist hasbara designed to show them in a better light. It is quite possible that they simply didn't have the resources to get rid of more Palestinians, or more charitably perhaps some of them thought that peaceful coexistence could be achieved.
But there is absolutely no doubt that it happened, as evidenced by the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians living outside their own homeland.
I'm now waiting for the "Their leaders told them to leave!" myth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJ9PKQbkJv8&t=1175s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqK3_n6pdDY

I know that he has researchers to do the hard lifting, but it's a pity that comedians have a better take on subjects often than supposed serious pundits.

Chris Trotter said...

In my experience, Guerilla, people who describe a version of history radically at odds with their own as a "myth" are simply betraying the extent to which they have become ideologically and emotionally committed to a singular, fixed, understanding of the past.

To say the history of Israel/Palestine is contested understates the problem considerably. In the war for hearts and minds that began when the first Zionists began buying up land in Ottoman Palestine, Truth was the first casualty.

The ranting of a zealously woke British comedian only reinforces the delight both sides continue to take in dancing on her corpse.

Guerilla Surgeon said...

A British woke comedian? Who has – with all due respect – a lot more insight than you Chris. And the "myth" you refer to has been debunked. It's in peer-reviewed articles such as this:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/jps.2005.34.2.042?seq=1

The Jewish Virtual library says this:

"most simply fled to avoid being caught in the cross fire of a battle."

The dissident Israeli historian Ilan Pappe has debunked it in spite of death threats and he's not the only one.

The Palestinians say this:
https://decolonizepalestine.com/myth/palestinians-left-based-on-arab-orders/

I've been debating this topic with Zionists for half your lifetime at least. I've been charmed, cursed, and consigned to hell by both amateur Zionists and some I suspect paid by the Israeli state. (In fact it would be remiss of them not to monitor and comment on what's being said on important news sites), I have been accused of being a Hamas supporter by your good self without the slightest bit of evidence which pretty much sums up your research on the topic.
I think I am a little better informed than you.

Not only that, but you have never ever bothered to give the Palestinian point of view. You completely ignore it, except when it happens to impinge upon your Israeli propaganda. You talk about the delight both sides continue to take in dancing on her corpse, you've never presented both sides. Might as well be Fox News for all the insight you show.
All I would ask is that you show just at smidgen of empathy for the tens of thousands of people that have been killed, wounded and rendered homeless by the Israeli overreaction to the terrorist attack. Not a fucking sausage from you.