Little Green Men: Coming Or Going? Green Co-Leader, Metira Turei's State of the Nation speech made it very clear that her party has grown very weary of living on Planet Impotence - and may even be contemplating a departure for Planet Key. Her plans for Treasury to audit political parties' manifestos would certainly make the Greens' stay on Planet Key more comfortable.
I’M WORRIED that the oft-repeated claim that the Greens come
from another planet, might, in fact, be true. Because only someone recently
arrived from an altogether more benign solar system could possibly argue that
the NZ Treasury casting its cold forensic eye over left-wing parties’ policies
is a good idea. The astonishing naivety of the suggestion confirms every old
socialist’s slur that when you’re dealing with the Greens, you’re dealing with
the children of a very different tribe. And, honestly, after Metira Turei’s
“State of the Nation” speech, I’m minded to amend the end of that sentence to
read: “a very different and a very stupid
tribe.”
According to Ms Turei: “New Zealanders deserve more
transparency from their politicians so that they can better engage in the
political system. That’s why the Green Party is proposing the establishment of
[a Policy Costing Unit] to provide independent costings for the policies
proposed by political parties. The PCU would be an independent unit within the
Treasury and available to all parliamentary parties. It would help cut through
the noise of political party promises and deliver New Zealanders unbiased
information.”
Unbiased information! Clearly, the inhabitants of the planet
Ms Turei has been visiting for the past 32 years are entirely ignorant of the
1984 neoliberal coup-d’état spearheaded by the leaders of the New Zealand
Treasury. How else are we to explain her child-like faith in the Treasury’s
lack of bias? Any other politically aware individual from this benighted chunk
of our planet would have not the slightest difficulty in identifying No. 1 the
Terrace, Wellington, as New Zealand’s Barad-dûr – dwelling place of the Dark
Lord and source of all the woes of Middle Earth.
Can it really be true that Ms Turei has never heard of
“Economics II”, the special Treasury division headed by the late Roger Kerr (of
Business Roundtable fame) which, working alongside Dr Bryce Wilkinson and Dr
Graham Scott of “Economics I”, was responsible for bringing together “Economic
Management” – the policy bible for what came to be known as “Rogernomics”? Does
she really not know that the current institutional “culture” of Treasury
descends directly from these implacable ideologues?
Obviously not. Otherwise she wouldn’t dream of advocating
that her party entrust its policies to Treasury’s tender mercies. Any more than
she’d happily dispatch her youngest child for a sleepover at Michael Jackson’s
Neverland!
And yet, Ms Turei was here, in New Zealand, for the entire
time Treasury’s neoliberal evangelists were transforming the country. She knows
full well that before 1984 the number of children living below the poverty line
was 15 percent, and that after 20 years of Treasury-guided economic “reforms”,
that figure had nearly doubled.
So, if eradicating child poverty is one of the Greens’ most
important “twenty-first century policies” (as she told us, on the radio, only
this week) then how is she going to feel when Treasury solemnly vouchsafes to
the electorate that the measures her party proposes are not only unlikely to
reduce child poverty but may even make it worse. And if she refuses to believe
that Treasury would stoop to such blatantly political tactics, then all I can
recommend is that she spend an hour or two with Sir Michael Cullen. As Labour’s
finance minister from 1999 until 2008, he became something of an aficionado of
Treasury’s “ideological burps”.
There is, of course, another explanation for Ms Turei’s
extraordinary suggestion. It involves the Greens not arriving from, but
departing for, another planet. Planet Key.
After all, the planet they’re currently living on – Planet
Impotence – is a very dreary place. Nothing ever happens on this dismal chunk
of rock, and what makes their lives even more frustrating is that Planet Key
looks like a place where the right sort of Green could have such a lot of fun!
It’s so bright, so blue, and everyone living there looks so happy. A material
girl soon grows tired of hanging out with the poor and needy. Surely, it must
be someone else’s turn to nursemaid the Labour Party! Especially when, every
time Labour manages to construct a spaceship capable of lifting them off Planet
Impotence, they always leave the Greens behind!
And that’s the beauty of establishing a PCU! It more-or-less
guarantees that the Green Party’s Treasury-vetted policies will be
ideologically indistinguishable from those of a National Government.
This essay was
originally published in The Waikato Times, The Taranaki Daily News, The
Timaru Herald, The Otago Daily Times, The Greymouth Star of Friday, 29 January 2016.
8 comments:
It is a permanent problem with good people as opposed to bad people, in simple childish terms. The 'bad' people can't be considered in simple hopeful terms but require wariness and healthy scepticism looking for whatever delightful traps they may spring. The 'good' people may be plain foolish, even gullible, without the knowledge of Machiavelli's thoughts that it is wise to have read and understood.
It's been the same since Red Riding Hood went to see her Grandmother and noticed that she had sprouted sharp teeth, long ears and acquisitive eyes.
Chris you have hit the nail, the Greens have been wary / unhappy with Labour since Andrew Little publicly spurned Metiria Turei for a seat on the security committee.
James Shaw has a blue hue about him and I understand that a few of their big donors want feet under the table.
The debacle within Labour about TPPA will further lessen the Greens confidence in Labour.
I am not a supporter of the Greens but I can fully understand their concerns.
We are seeing and will probably see a few mistakes from the Greens as they re-position for 2017.
John Key may not pick the idea up but I would put money on that they he and National will be impressed.
All very true, Chris, assuming Ms Turei is totally on the level on this issue.
But I suspect it's a bluff and a well-aimed one, as there's no way she's going to get agreement for it from all or even most other parties.
The Greens have a genuine problem in the way the media paints them as fiscally reckless, despite all evidence to the contrary.
So what better way could there be to contest this perception than to challenge everyone to an ostensibly hyper-stringent level of fiscal rectitude, in the certain knowledge that it's not going to eventuate?
Far from being evidence that the Greens are off the planet, I think this move shows them being very much of this world.
Just maybe, might the reason for this new policy be that the NZ Greens really believe that their policies cost well (as they have shown themselves many times) and have been talking to their Aussie Green mates and learned that the Aussie Greens got exactly such a independent Treasury costing unit established in Oz when they were in govt, and found it to be a great thing for levelling the playing field a bit against the myth of good economic management by the Liberals? Did you ring Metiria to ask a few basic questions before dreaming up conspiracy theories about the Greens joining with National, Chris?
I suspect Chris that another motivation for this move from the Greens is to help push NZ in the direction of state funded political parties.
I suspect that for Parties to cost out policies takes a reasonable chunk of their leaders budget so this is a way of pushing some cost onto the Parliamentary Budget - however there may be a downside as you have pointed out as the results may not be to the Pollies liking.
The one issue I have with this idea is that in the heat of an Election Campaign, heat/blame/accusations will start being heaped onto a Government Department if the published costings are not to the liking of any particular Politicians.
Much better for Pollies to put some effort into costing and ownership of their own policy so that if they do attain Government they have some idea of what is involved in implementing their policies.
Also if the costings have been done badly or contain obvious errors then Pollies should cop the blame not some hapless bureaucrat who cannot defend themselves.
Cheers
Jimmie
I am generally in favour of the concept. I wouldn't put it in Treasury though. It should be part of Parliament although Public Servants, including those from Treasury would be seconded.
However how on earth could it work? I have looked at one of the Green Party policies which is apparently dear to Meteria's heart.
https://home.greens.org.nz/policy/childrens-policy-every-child-matters
Can anyone see a way to cost this? It goes on and on with a series of platitudes. They sound good but have no substance for an analyst to cost.
Would they be allowed to release a report that says something like.
"This policy is so ill defined that no costing is possible" and have it stamped on every page of the policy document that is released?
Very interesting points coming up in this discussion Chris. First yours, Victors, and also Anonymous Jimmie. Is this a cunning plan, better fashioned than the ones from Blackadder? Hope we get a lot more comments, as each one adds another facet.
greywarbler
I don't see this Silly Season diversion as even mildly Baldrickian.
It's bog standard spin, totally transparent and, as such, not to be taken seriously.
But I'm glad to see the Greens capable of a bit of low level skulduggery.
Post a Comment