There Can Be Only One: The ingredients were all there for a major political upset. Just under 60 percent of the voters of Ikaroa-Rawhiti supported somebody other than the by-election's eventual winner, Meka Whaitiri (Right). Had the voters thrown their weight behind the Mana Party candidate, Te Hamua Nikora (Second from Right) they could have sent a powerful message not only to the Maori Party (which has received the message that was sent loud and clear!) but also to the Labour Party (which, arguably, needs it the most).
IMAGINE A BILLIONAIRE with an interest in psephology (the
academic study of elections and electoral behaviour). It’s by no means a
far-fetched notion. The billionaire Koch brothers in the USA have invested
millions in their quest to master the American electoral system. The
billionaire currency speculator, George Soros, has similarly poured huge sums
into US organisations dedicated to “getting out the vote”. So long as our
leaders are elected, wealthy individuals will always have an interest in learning
as much as possible about how democracy works.
Watching the Ikaroa-Rawhiti results come in on Saturday
night, it occurred to me that with a little help from a friendly billionaire it
would be possible to interview every person who participated in the by-election
and ask them to explain their choice.
Ikaroa-Rawhiti is, of course, a Maori seat and is prone,
like all Maori seats, to low voter turnout. Last Saturday’s by-election proved
to be no exception, with only 10,519 of the approximately 33,000 registered electors
participating in the ballot. Assuming one had the funding, 10,519 individuals
is a small enough sample for a well-resourced team of professional researchers
to interview in its entirety.
It would be a fascinating exercise. Most of us have, at one
time or another, looked at an election result and scratched our heads. Why do
people vote the way they do? What makes them support candidates representing
parties with such a poor record of defending their interests? Why don’t more
voters use their ballot strategically to secure effective representation – or simply
to deliver a shock to the political system as a whole?
Last weekend it was within the power of the Ikaroa-Rawhiti
electors to really upset New Zealand’s political apple cart. By shifting their
support away from the Labour Party they could have delivered a stinging –
perhaps fatal – rebuke to the Party’s lacklustre leader, David Shearer. At the
very least, a rejection of Labour’s candidate would have precipitated a period
of intense soul-searching within both the caucus and the wider party
organisation. Labour’s entire approach to the Maori vote would have been up for
review.
Wouldn’t that have been a more useful result for the people
of Ikaroa-Rawhiti?
The voters of Ikaroa-Rawhiti also had the chance to deliver
a sharp rejoinder to the Maori Party’s endless internal dogfighting. The
leadership tussle between Dr Pita Sharples and the Waiariki MP, Te Ururoa
Flavell, has weakened the Maori Party to the point where the likelihood of it retaining
even the seats it holds currently is now in question. Had the electors put to
one side the obvious personal qualities of the Maori Party candidate, Na Raihania
(the strongest, individually, of all the contenders) and collapsed the Maori
Party vote, the message to Dr Sharples and his colleagues would have been
unmistakeable: “Get your act together – or this will be your fate!”
To be fair to the electors of Ikaroa-Rawhiti, they sort of
sent a message to the Maori Party by demoting it from second-place-getter in
2011, to third-place-getter on Saturday. It was not, however, a very compelling
message. Mr Raihania’s strong campaigning held his party’s vote together
sufficiently well to limit his rival’s, the Mana Party’s Te Hamua Nikora’s,
lead to just 500 votes.
Had the 2,104 Maori Party Voters, and the 1,118 electors who
gave their vote to the Greens’ Marama Davidson, thrown their support behind Mr
Nikora’s Mana Party, then the combined tally of votes (5,899) would’ve been
more than enough to defeat the Labour candidate, Meka Whaitiri’s, winning total
of 4,368.
Yes, they would have been taking a rather large punt on the
colourful Mr Nikora, but it would only have been for 18 months. Had his
performance as a Member of Parliament not been up to scratch they could easily
have replaced him at the end of next year. In the meantime, the powerful
messages his election would have sent – both to the Labour and Maori parties –
would have benefited not just the people of Ikaroa-Rawhiti but the whole of New
Zealand.
Sadly, that was not what happened. Rather than upset the
apple cart, the electors of Ikaroa-Rawhiti (or, rather, just over a third of
them) collectively kept it trundling along.
In electing a worthy, but pretty colourless,
bureaucrat-cum-manager to represent them, Ikaroa-Rawhiti’s voters have
bolstered the position of Mr Shearer and his supporters. Ms Whaitiri’s “respectable”
win will allow the party to stumble on for another couple of months – or until
the next disaster. By giving so many votes to Mr Raihania they have muted the
message that a decisive shift of support to Mana would have sent to the Maori
Party. It, too, has been permitted to stumble on.
So, if any public-spirited billionaires happen to read this
– please get in touch.
We’d all benefit by discovering why democracy is so hard to
master.
This essay was
originally published in The Press of Tuesday,
2 July 2013.
